02:34 PM
Monday, May 27, 2024
Books – Saber Al-Mahlawi:
Today, Monday, the Agouza Misdemeanor Court punished the business manager of the late musician Helmy Bakr with three years in prison and a bail of 50,000 pounds on charges of seizing from him a sum of money estimated at 2 million and 280 thousand pounds, on the pretext of including him in a fictitious project.
The investigation authorities in Giza had referred the former business manager of musician Helmy Bakr to criminal trial, on charges of seizing from him an amount of two million two hundred and eighty thousand pounds.
The order to refer the accused, “N.A,” the former business manager of the musician Helmi Bakr, in Case No. 23030 of 2023, misdemeanor in Agouza, to criminal trial, according to the papers, a misdemeanor under Article 336/1 of the Penal Code, revealed that the accused in 2023 in the Agouza police department seized the sums. The financial documents shown in the papers and owned by the victim, Hilmi Eid Muhammad Bakr, were done using fraudulent methods that would lead the victim to believe in a false project.
The Public Prosecution in Giza heard lawyer Sameh Thabet, representing musician Helmy Bakr, in his report against his client’s former business manager, accusing him of seizing a sum of money estimated at two million two hundred and eighty thousand pounds.
Sameh Thabet revealed in his statements before the investigating authorities that the defendant took advantage of his client’s illness to seize his money.
While the Public Prosecution demanded that the investigations into the incident be expedited to reveal the circumstances of the report, and that the defendant be summoned to hear his statements as evidence.
The musician Helmy Bakr’s lawyer issued a report bearing the number 23,030 misdemeanors, accusing his former manager of seizing a sum of money estimated at two million two hundred and eighty thousand pounds.
The report accused the complainant, who was working as a business manager for his client, the musician Helmy Bakr, with fraud, fraud, and seizing a sum of money, after he was tricked into tying his sum of money in a bank to one of the banks with an 18% certificate. One of the bank employees came to his client’s residence to take his signature and later discovered that the complainant had His right to transfer the amount to his own account.